Naomi Kleins No Logo An analytical critique free essay sample

An assessment of the legitimacy of Naomi Kleins book, 'No Logo' as it applies to the post-Fordian word. This paper is about the hidden topics of Naomi Kleins top of the line No Logo (2000), the book that turned into a development, an enthusiastic enemy of globalization declaration. The paper takes a gander at the hidden subjects of Fordism and post-Fordism, shopper culture and globalization, and breaks down Kleins contentions while drawing on an assortment of sources, both artistic, William Gibson, Aldous Huxley and George Orwell, and scholastic/*Kennedy Cohen in addition to standing out Kleins communist plan from libertarian standards. In No Logo, Naomi Klein dissects the impacts of present day promoting on Western culture and culture in the late 90s. She contends, generally, against its expansive consequences for regular day to day existence, just as on the moral issues related with the transition to a post-Fordist society, where creation happens in underdeveloped nations under what is, essentially, nineteenth century conditions. We will compose a custom exposition test on Naomi Kleins No Logo: A logical study or then again any comparable point explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page

Conquest of Aztecs

Victory of Aztecs Presentation Conquest ever. The success of Mexico can be viewed as one of the occasions on the planet history that can be seen as per the artistic sources accessible on the victory. All things considered, two respectable sources Five Letters of Cortã ©s to the Emperor: 1519-1526 by Hernan Cortã ©s and The Broken Spears: The Aztec Account of the Conquest of Mexico by Miguel Leyn-Portilla advocate alternate points of view on this memorable wonder with nitty gritty portrayals and evidence.Advertising We will compose a custom paper test on Conquest of Aztecs explicitly for you for just $16.05 $11/page Learn More However, to have a full image of what has occurred in Mexico in the period of the Aztec realm, it is important to consider the two viewpoints and break down perspectives on the two sides of the contention. Incongruities in Amerindian and Spanish variants. The fundamental part of incongruities in the forms revealed by Spaniards and Amerindians concerns the job of the two sides i n the contention and the position they advocate. Subsequently, Spaniards, whose form has been viewed as the main narrative wellspring of the success, see this contention as a standard thing when they educated the occupants concerning their amicable goals yet annihilated the city to gather gold and different wealth. Simultaneously, Amerindians’ point of view mirrors the way of life of the Aztecs and absence of information about the genuine plans of Spaniards. In spite of the fact that these two sources are totally unique, they share a great deal for all intents and purpose as they exhibit similar occasions from alternate points of view and appear t supplement one another. Correlation of Sources First reports about the contact of Spaniards and Aztecs, crucial Spaniards, and view of Aztecs. The principal experiences of Spaniards and Aztecs are seen in various manners by the two creators. All things considered, Cortã ©s claims that Spaniards were amicable to the locals and neede d to set up business relations with the delegates of the Aztec realm so as to exchange with them while the locals invited them in a threatening way and numerous Spaniards were slaughtered or injured: Cortã ©s, answering by methods for the local mediator whom he had with him, educated them he would do them no damage yet scold them and carry them to the information on our Holy Catholic Faith, that they may become vassals of your Majesty and serve and obey him, as had the Indians and people groups of those parts which are as of now inhabited with Spanish subjects of your Majesty (Cortã ©s Five Letters 4). Simultaneously, this occasion was depicted in a totally unique manner by Leyn-Portilla.Advertising Looking for exposition on history? How about we check whether we can support you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The Aztecs were scared when they came to think about the appearance of outsiders however them to be of awesome source. Along these lines, â€Å"Prince Ixtlilx ochitl of Tezcoco †¦ left his city with a gathering of supporters to welcome Cortã ©s in peace† (Leyn-Portilla II-330). This implies the Aztecs were prepared to invite the outsiders and offer all that they had with them since they trusted Spaniards to be the divine beings that came back to their nation to administer it. At the end of the day, the impression of Aztecs was generally set apart with their strict customs and social quirks while the view of Spaniards was stamped uniquely with a longing to serve the crown of his Majesty, spread Christianity no matter what, and improve themselves and the Spanish rulers with the gold they saw in the landmass. The distinction happens because of the assortments in the impression of the victory as an idea by the two sides with respect to one gathering this was a slaughter and obliteration of the realm while for another this turned into a wellspring of riches. The picture of Aztecs by Spaniards, and picture of conquistadors by Aztecs . The picture of each gathering varies incredibly from another. This occurs because of the incongruities in their perspectives, foundation information on the two sides, capacity to surmise from what they see, and utilize the data gained for additional turn of events. Simultaneously, the two creators underline the awesome inception of Spaniards as saw by Aztecs. For example, Amerindians believed Spaniard to be their divine beings and were prepared to acknowledge whatever they state because of their longing to be useful for their divine beings. The main contacts of Spaniards and Aztecs mirror the profound respect of the two gatherings, â€Å"the ruler was bewildered to see a man with such white skin and with a whiskers and with so much fearlessness and majesty† (Leyn-Portilla II-331) just as Cortã ©s transparently appreciated the individuals he saw. This implies inviting connections could be the reason for future collaboration, trade, and association. The principle explanation behind Spaniards to assault the Aztecs incorporated their craving to serve the Spanish crown and â€Å"bring the locals of the land to the information on our Catholic faith† (Cortã ©s The Fifth Letter 4) and gather the wealth of the land so as to bring those to the territory for their rulers. As detailed by Townsend, â€Å"The conviction was an integral part of their [Aztecs’] cosmology and doesn't using any and all means demonstrate that they were deficient in insight or that their way of life was ‘less developed’† (para. 4).Advertising We will compose a custom article test on Conquest of Aztecs explicitly for you for just $16.05 $11/page Learn More The principle explanation behind their disparities was how they would have preferred to coordinate since it was significant for Aztecs to stay a state with its own ruler and culture while the Spaniards attempted to spread their confidence using any and all means and recover as much gold and different wealth from this inexhaustible land as they could utilizing viciousness to convince individuals agree with their position. Tenochtitlan and Cortã ©s annihilating the principle city of Aztec domain. The part of collaboration is seen diversely by the two creators who give proof to help their points of view. Simultaneously, this viewpoint seems, by all accounts, to be conclusive for the two gatherings as they have various missions and have various methods for their achievement. All things considered, it is important to survey the source by Chaliand who refers to a passage from the book Letters from Mexico by Hernan Cortã ©s where the chief Cortã ©s reports the leaders of Spain about the triumph over locals and the consequences of their battle and the city they have caught. Besides, the creator counts the urban areas they have annihilated and other ‘successful outcomes’. Unexpectedly, this circumstance with the primary city of the Aztec realm called Tenochtitlan was seen as the coldblooded and unjustifiable activity of Spaniards toward the local occupants of this land. Leyn-Portilla portrays: â€Å"When the Spaniards went into the Royal House, they put Motecuhzoma under gatekeeper and held him under their vigilance† (II-334). This implies they claimed to be inviting just to arrive at the gold and were not inspired by trade with these individuals. Spaniards utilized Aztecs to arrive at their objective and played out their undertakings with extraordinary pitilessness; they â€Å"gathered all the gold into an incredible mount and put a match to everything else, paying little heed to its value† (Leyn-Portilla II-334). This implies Spaniards couldn't have cared less about the social legacy of the local individuals of Mexico since they needed gold and they got gold †the objective was achieved. Be that as it may, the annihilating of the city of Tenochtitlan isn't depicted by Cortã ©s as something wrong which ought not have been done or exceptional requirements of warriors or hostility from locals that could have caused such savage reaction. The all the more fascinating is the issue why the locals permitted Spaniards to catch their boss and consume their homes and deny them of their wealth and other important issues. Fighting: Gap in mechanical issues. The hole in innovation made the Aztecs incapable to vanquish the Spaniards and safeguard themselves and their sovereigns. IfAdvertising Searching for paper on history? How about we check whether we can support you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Find out More Cortã ©s composes that the Aztecs â€Å"many walled in areas, pits and jettison, and numerous sorts of weapons† (131); nonetheless, these weapons were generally for battling with others from different settlings and for chasing. Such point of view assists with dissecting the whole ideas of the victory and its prosperity for Spaniards since they could utilize their further developed weapon to overcome these individuals with spending insignificant HR on this. The weapons of Aztecs are portrayed in another manner by â€Å"The most significant hostile weapon of the Aztecs was the Macana, a kind of oar molded wooden club edged with sharp bits of obsidian†¦during the Conquest warriors guillotined Spanish ponies at a solitary stroke† (Leyn-Portilla II-328). Also, the customs were a necessary piece of the Aztec culture and they didn't begin a war without announcing it to the adversaries. Truth be told, the custom to pronounce war clarifies everything as the Aztecs were not prepared to battle since they invited Spaniards as their companions. Simultaneously, the two viewpoints incorporate depiction of weapons and fighting aptitudes of the Aztec warriors differentiated to the absence of information about the region controlled by the Spaniards. As it were, the principle mechanical preferred position of the Spaniards can be viewed as the manner in which they began the war without pronouncing it and got them unprepared. In spite of the fact that Spaniards had indigenous partners among locals, they experienced endemic maladies which were one of the fundamental downsides of their military while locals were less defenseless regarding their wellbeing and endemic sicknesses yet really had faith in regard and different excellencies average of honorable men (as you recollect that, they respected the boldness and grandness of Cortã ©s when they initially observed him). End The debate that emerges after reviewin

The North American Free Trade Agreement Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

The North American Free Trade Agreement - Essay Example This implies at ideal work usage it can either create, say 600 pounds of corn or 300 pounds of nuts. In the interim, Mexico can substitute the creation of same items at the trade proportion of . Thusly, it might decide to deliver either 200 pounds of corn or 150 pounds of nuts. (Samuelson and Nordhaus, 2000) After opening up or changing exchange between the two countries, their underlying creation probability bends, spoke to by the strong line, rotate. In the event of the US, it could in any case produce 600 pounds of corn. Be that as it may, with exchanging with Mexico, it might now wind up with moderately increasingly nuts utilizing Mexico's cost proportion. So also, Mexico winds up with a similar amount of nuts however this time it might wind up with more corn as it exchanged with Mexico at the last's value proportion. The above model shows the advantages inferred by nations, especially exporters and buyers, when nations open up to exchange or experience exchange progression. As per the Foreign Agricultural Service (2005), deals of corn to Mexico and Canada expanded by 175% with exponential increment in send out an incentive somewhere in the range of 1993 and 2004. For this situation, ranchers can discover abroad markets for their gather, along these lines, upgrading their profit pote ntial.

An Exception to Tradition - Literature Essay Samples

â€Å"We can either emphasize those aspects of our traditions, religious or secular, that speak of hatred, exclusion, and suspicion or work with those that stress the interdependence and equality of all human beings. The choice is yours.† Karen Armstrong, the author of Twelve Steps to a Compassion Life, reminds us that blind adherence to tradition can prevent the equality of all human beings and delay the process of achieving true independence. In Chaim Potok’s novel The Chosen and Peter Stone and Sherman Edwards’s play 1776, Reb Saunders and John Dickinson grapple with the idea of defying tradition by granting Danny and The Thirteen Colonies the right to be independent; although both men are initially stubborn in their extremely illiberal positions, they eventually grant permission to their cherished possessions to emerge into a liberated world. Having to continue his father’s legacy as a Hasidic tzaddik, Danny begins to resent his roots and search for freedom in the secular realm of literature. Confiding in his dear companion Reuven, Danny states, â€Å"It’s really funny. I have to be a rabbi and don’t want to be one. You don’t have to be a rabbi and do want to be one. It’s a crazy world† (Potok 87). Clinging to his tradition beliefs and convictions, Reb Saunders exclaims, â€Å"Master of the Universe†¦ you gave me a brilliant son and I have thanked you a million times. But you had to make him so brilliant?† (168). After learning from Reuven of Danny’s secular activities, Reb Saunders abhors Danny’s deviation from the traditional Hasidic lifestyle which he himself was â€Å"taught by [his] father† (279). Although the customs and rituals of pre-World War Two, Jewish Europe are still much ingrained in Reb Saunders, he is well-aware of the difficulty th at would arise from â€Å"not causing [his] son, God forbid, to abandon the Master of the Universe and His Commandments† (279). Ensnared in between two paths of either granting independence to his son or forcing him into an arranged marriage, Reb Saunders ultimately chooses to give permission for Danny to explore his intellectual desires and enroll in a graduate program at Columbia University. As Reb Saunders states, â€Å"Today is—the Festival of Freedom†¦ today my Daniel is free† (281-282), Danny promptly receives his Passover blessing and achieves sovereignty. John Dickinson, a Continental Congress delegate from Pennsylvania, experiences the same tradition-shattering struggle as Reb Saunders. As the most obstinate delegate at the Convention, Dickinson advocates anti-independence, and stubbornly holds on to his political desires to the point where he refuses to release his hope â€Å"for [America’s] eventual reconciliation with England† (Stone 140). Dickinson’s uncompromising, resistance stance successfully allows the idea of succession to be blockaded for a great period of time. His constant negations seem especially discouraging when after Richard Henry Lee of Virginia proposes a resolution for independence, he shouts to John Hancock, â€Å"Mr. President, Pennsylvania moves, as always, that the question of independence be postponed indefinitely† (33). However, as Lee’s proposal gains an incredible amount of support, the inevitability of the signing of the Declaration of Independence forces John Dickinson to concede his pigheadedness. Although voting â€Å"Nay† in a split-delegation vote, he ultimately relinquishes his vision for America as a perpetual British colony and remarks, â€Å"I will join the army and fight in [America’s] defense, even though I believe that fight to be hopeless† (140). Although Reb Saunders and John Dickinson may externally appear to be invoking tradition simply for the sake of impeding progress, both men are indeed genuinely concerned with the pursuit of righteousness. Having only witnessed tradition as a precedent approach to resolving situations, Dickinson and Reb Saunders fear making a crucial, uncustomary decision that will impact the future of their respective communities. John Dickinson, exhibiting overprotectiveness yet authentic concern states, â€Å"Dont forget that most men with nothing would rather protect the possibility of becoming rich than face the reality of being poor† (96). However, not only does he foresee economic, social stability in a British-ruled America, Dickinson simply doesn’t possess the view of King George III of as a ‘tyrant,’ but rather, as the ruler of â€Å"the noblest, most civilized nation on the planet† (39). Reb Saunders, like Dickinson, shares the ultimate goal of freedom and liberty via tradition; neither man identifies an issue with the tradition simply because he shares a different, biased perspective. However, Reb Saunders finally comes to the epiphany that although Danny may choose to refrain from becoming a tzaddik, he may still have â€Å"the soul of tzaddik no matter what he did with his life† (Potok 279). Reb Saunders distinctly indicates that it wasn’t his lifelong goal to impose the burden of having to become a tzaddik on Danny, but instead to mold his son as a person who â€Å"must know how to suffer for his people†¦take their pain and carry it on [his] shoulder†¦always† (278). Both John Dickinson and Reb Saunders, two men alike in regard for traditional values, experience a surrendering of something they once grasped so tightly. Tenaciously clasping his religious beliefs that were cultivated in the motherland, Reb Saunders hesitantly allows his son to break away from a centuries-old tradition by not forcing him to become a tzaddik. At the same time, John Dickinson, an anti-secessionist who fervently disregards the other colonies’ hope for ever becoming independent, dolefully abdicates his extreme views in favor of giving permission for the remaining delegates to sign the Declaration of Independence. The sole way of exhibiting love emerges not from grasping onto something so tightly, but letting it go. As Danny â€Å"turned into Lee Avenue and was gone† (253), the Liberty Bell, initiating the fight toward American independence, sounded with its glorious ring that echoed the inscription on it which reads, â€Å"Proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants thereof† (Leviticus 25:10).

Patrick Henry, an American Revolutionary Patriot

Patrick Henry was more than just a lawyer, patriot, and orator; he was one of the great leaders of the American Revolutionary War who is best known for the quote â€Å"Give me liberty or give me death†, yet this leader never held a national political office. Although Henry was a radical leader in opposition to the British, he refused to accept the new U.S. government and is considered instrumental for the passage of the Bill of Rights. Early Years Patrick Henry was born in  Hanover County, Virginia  on May 29, 1736,  to John and Sarah Winston Henry.  Patrick was born on a plantation which had belonged to his mother’s family for a long time. His father was a Scottish immigrant who attended Kings College at the University of Aberdeen in Scotland and whom also educated Patrick at home.  Patrick was the second oldest of nine children. When Patrick was fifteen, he managed a store his father owned, but this business soon failed. As were many of this era, Patrick grew up in a religious setting with an uncle who was an Anglican minister and his mother would take him to Presbyterian services. In 1754, Henry married Sarah Shelton and they had six children before her death in 1775.  Sarah had a dowry which was a 600-acre tobacco farm which also included a house with six slaves.  Henry was unsuccessful as a farmer and in 1757 the house was destroyed by a fire. After selling the slaves, Henry was also unsuccessful as a storekeeper. Henry studied law on his own, as was customary at that time in colonial America. In 1760, he passed his attorney’s examination in Williamsburg, Virginia before a group of the most influential and famous Virginia lawyers including Robert Carter Nicholas, Edmund Pendleton, John and Peyton Randolph, and George Wythe. Legal and Political Career In 1763, Henry’s reputation as not only a lawyer but also who was able to captivate an audience with his oratory skills was secured with the famous case known as â€Å"Parson’s Cause.†Ã‚  Colonial Virginia had passed a law regarding payment for ministers which resulted in decreasing their income.  The ministers complained which caused King George III to overturn it. A minister won a lawsuit against the colony for back pay and it was up to a jury to determine the amount of damages. Henry convinced the jury to only award a single farthing (one penny) by arguing that a king would veto such a law was nothing more than â€Å"a tyrant who forfeits the allegiance of his subjects.†Ã¢â‚¬â€¹ Henry was elected to the Virginia House of Burgesses in 1765 where he became one the earliest argue against the Crown’s oppressive colonial policies.  Henry gained fame during the debate over the Stamp Act of 1765 which negatively impacted mercantile trade in the North American colonies by requiring almost every paper used by colonists were to be printed on  stamped paper  that was produced in London and contained an embossed  revenue stamp. Henry argued that on Virginia should have the right to levy any taxes on its’ own citizens. Although some believed that Henry’s comments were treasonous, once his arguments were published in other colonies, the displeasure with British rule began to flourish. American Revolutionary War Henry used his words and rhetoric in a way that made him  a driving force behind the revolt against Britain.  Although Henry was very well educated, he was to discuss his political philosophies into words that the common man could easily grasp and make as their own ideology as well. His oratory skills helped to have him selected in 1774 to the Continental Congress in Philadelphia where he not only served as a delegate but is where he met Samuel Adams.  At the Continental Congress, Henry united the colonists stating that The distinctions between Virginians, Pennsylvanians, New Yorkers and New Englanders, are no more. I am not a Virginian, but an American. In March 1775 at the Virginia Convention, Henry made the argument for taking military action against Britain with what is commonly referred to as his most famous speech proclaiming that Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? ... Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death! Shortly after this speech, the American Revolution  began on April 19, 1775, with the â€Å"shot heard around the world† at Lexington and Concord.  Although Henry was immediately named as commander in chief of Virginias forces, he quickly resigned this post preferring to stay in Virginia where he aided in drafting the states constitution and becoming its’ first governor in 1776. As governor, Henry aided George Washington by supplying troops and much-needed provisions.  Although Henry would resign after serving three terms as governor, he would serve two more terms in that position in the mid-1780s.  In 1787, Henry chose not to attend the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia which resulted in the drafting of a new Constitution. As an  Anti-Federalist, Henry opposed the new Constitution arguing that this document would not only promote a corrupt government but that the three branches would compete with each other for more power leading to a tyrannical federal government.  Henry also objected to the Constitution because it did not contain any freedoms or rights for individuals. At the time, these were commonplace in state constitutions which were based on the Virginia model that Henry helped to write and which explicitly listed the individual rights of citizens that were protected. This was in direct opposition to the British model which did not contain any written protections. Henry argued against Virginia ratifying the Constitution as he believed that it did not protect states rights.  However, in an 89-to-79 vote, Virginia lawmakers ratified the Constitution. The Final Years In 1790 Henry chose to be a lawyer over public service, turning down appointments to the United States Supreme Court, Secretary of State and U.S. Attorney General.  Instead, Henry enjoyed that he had a successful and thriving legal practice as well as spending with his second wife, Dorothea Dandridge, who he had married in 1777. Henry also had seventeen children who were born between his two wives. In 1799, fellow Virginian George Washington persuaded Henry to run for a seat in the Virginia legislature.  Although Henry won the election, he died on June 6, 1799, at his â€Å"Red Hill† estate prior to ever taking office.  Henry is commonly referred to as one of the great revolutionary leaders who lead to the formation of the United States.

Essay Biology, 7e (Campbell) Chapter 24 the Origin of...

Biology, 7e (Campbell) Chapter 24: The Origin of Species Chapter Questions 1) Which of the following applies to both anagenesis and cladogenesis? A) branching B) increased diversity C) speciation D) more species E) adaptive radiation Answer: C Topic: Concept 24.1 Skill: Comprehension 2) Which of the following statements about species, as defined by the biological species concept, is (are) correct? I. Biological species are defined by reproductive isolation. II. Biological species are the model used for grouping extinct forms of life. III. The biological species is the largest unit of population in which successful reproduction is possible. A) I only B) II only C) I and III D) II and III E) I,†¦show more content†¦What type of reproductive barrier is most obviously separating these different species? A) habitat isolation B) temporal isolation C) behavioral isolation D) gametic isolation E) postzygotic isolation Answer: A Topic: Concept 24.1 Skill: Comprehension 13) Which of the following must occur during a period of geographic isolation in order for two sibling species to remain genetically distinct following their geographic reunion in the same home range? A) prezygotic barriers B) postzygotic barriers C) ecological isolation D) reproductive isolation E) temporal isolation Answer: D Topic: Concept 24.1 Skill: Comprehension Use the following options to answer the following questions. For each description of reproductive isolation, select the option that best describes it. Options may be used once, more than once, or not at all. A. gametic B. temporal C. behavioral D. habitat E. mechanical 14) two species of orchids with different floral anatomy Answer: E Topic: Concept 24.1 Skill: Application 15) two species of trout that breed in different seasons Answer: B Topic: Concept 24.1 Skill: Knowledge 16) two species of meadowlarks with differentShow MoreRelatedStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 Pages22 †¢ Improving Ethical Behavior 22 Coming Attractions: Developing an OB Model 23 An Overview 23 †¢ Inputs 24 †¢ Processes 25 †¢ Outcomes 25 Summary and Implications for Managers 30 S A L Self-Assessment Library How Much Do I Know About Organizational Behavior? 4 Myth or Science? â€Å"Most Acts of Workplace Bullying Are Men Attacking Women† 12 An Ethical Choice Can You Learn from Failure? 24 glOBalization! Does National Culture Affect Organizational Practices? 30 Point/Counterpoint Lost in Translation

Human Resource Planning Job Analysis

Questions: 1. General Process of Job Analysis.2. How Job Analysis is related to Job Description.3. Legal issues of Job Analysis.4. Implications of job analysis.5. Has any position within an organization for which I have worked for been subjected to job analysis?6. Usefulness of Job Analysis in an Organization. Answers: Introduction Most firms and organizations are experiencing day to day changes regarding labor advancements, machines and equipment in all sorts of manner due to stiff competition from other companies. Thus, HR managers in most organizations must come up with plans and goals that help in smooth running of the business. Additionally, the human resource managers must be aggressive and have the technical knowledge of how to handle his or her organization employees effectively for better achievement of the organization's goals and objectives. The essay is showing the typical process of job analysis including its legal issues and clearly prove how the job analysis process can be better useful and relevant to the growth of an organization. 1. General Process of Job Analysis Job analysis is the standardized procedure of acquiring information for the tasks needed for the job and human capital attributes of the individuals to perform tasks. It is also known as work analysis. In addition, job analysis is the key foundation of most human resource activities involved in organizations, as it includes programs such as selection, recruitment, training and even compensation of employees (Armstrong and Taylor, 2014). The process of job analysis involves the following steps; Identifying the reason for conducting the job analysis. The reason should be in favour of organization's strategic plan and success. List down the jobs to be analysed. When you identify the cause for job analysis, it provides a platform of knowing the positions to be included in the job analysis. Review reasonable background data. Going back to the previous work and data helps to provide necessary information with where to begin the project. Execute and plan the job analysis project. There must be data collection and plan developed on how to carry out project activities. Note the job description and specifications. Having collected and analyzed data that is written to work output, job descriptions, and specifications. Periodic review of the job analysis. Organisations should use a revolving process whereby it examines a section of the organization annually thus the entire group ends up examined within a period of three to five years. 2. How Job Analysis is related to Job Description Job analysis is the procedure that gives duties and requirements of a particular job and provides information about the responsibilities, duties, outcomes and the necessarily needed skills of a particular job. Job analysis eventually gives the information required for writing job specification and description job, since job description is a written report that lists all job functions, duties, roles and responsibilities of employees. The job description is, therefore, the result of job analysis. The relationship between job analysis and job description evidently comes in when one has to have job analysis as the primary fundamental basis where job description is derived. Job description mainly assists human resource managers in job evaluations, staff training, staff performance appraisal, recruitment of employees and others. The HR departments need to formulate their ideas and primary objectives from job analysis first for them to come up with a job description. The job description is, therefore, the outcome or end product of job analysis that helps human resource managers when it comes to the efficient running of the organization. Henceforth, in human resource planning both job analysis and job description are required in management (Imran, and Cheema 2014). 3. Legal issues of Job Analysis The following are the legal guidelines required in the process of implementing job analysis programs in organizations. First is the uniform selection of employees whereby the law requires similar procedures and guidelines employed when it comes to the handling of employees. A brief job analysis should be looked into when selecting employees. Validity study reviewed according to information of the available job and all the job analysis should be listed correctly on selection. Significant work behavior of the job should also be noted and all the procedures involved in them properly. The job analysis should also comply with the Australian Disabilities Act (ADA) which explicitly states that a physically challenged person must be able to work properly for him or her to get the job. The ADA also requires reasonable accommodation for physically challenged individuals in in the workplace. It is, therefore, important for human resource managers when planning their job analysis and description to adhere to these regulations for the efficient management of the organization (Berman, Van Wart 2015). 4. Implications of job analysis Distorted data due to lack of cooperation from employees when job analysis is being carried out due to fear of losing a job. The job analyst does not get the actual data on how a particular section of employees needs to be improved. Job analysis is a lengthy project which is frustrating to the job analyst as it requires a lot of time to collect data. Job analysis can fall in the hands of unqualified job analyst thus the collected data is not complete because he is not able to perform the duties as required. When job analysis is carried out, mental abilities of an employee cannot be observed thus being forced to at times fire an individual who is knowledgeable. All that is told to the job analyst by employees may not be true thus he requires different measures to get the real information from the sources of collecting data are small. 5. Has any position within an organization for which I have worked for been subjected to job analysis? Yes. As an industrial engineer, my body has been subjected to this process of job analysis severally as the human resource manager regularly gathers, synthesizes information about certain tasks in the organization. From manpower planning to performance of the total employees in all sectors are heavily involved in the job analysis which clearly leads to the better achievement of the firm's objectives. Training of employees and success planning are fundamental basics of job analysis which makes the organization run efficiently in achieving its goals for example in the previous years it has attained more sales in the market than before. 6. Usefulness of Job Analysis in an Organization Job analysis helps with the improvement of the organization productivity and growth. Its importance is; Training and development whereby job analysis is useful in assessing employee's needs and requirements when training. Job analysis is also used in the creation and redesigning of jobs in an organization. Job analysis evaluates the sectors that need addition or removal of employees for output increase and better performance of employees. Job analysis plays a vital role in compensation management whereby the pay packages, wages, and salaries of employees are decided to depend on the job titles and duties. Job analysis is essential when it comes to recruitment and selection. It helps in determining the right personnel required in performing a particular job of the organization in the right place. Job analysis also assists human resource managers in performance evaluation whereby they are easily able to measure if their stated goals and objectives get achieved. Conclusion Job analysis is a crucial requirement when it comes to effective and efficient human resource planning in an organization. Therefore, human resource managers should correctly plan their goals and objectives necessary for the better performance of their overall organization productivity with proper designing of job analysis. This should be accompanied by the recruitment of the job candidates with the most suitable job design traits. References Armstrong, M., Taylor, S. (2014). Armstrong's Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. Kogan Page Publishers. Berman, E. M., Bowman, J. S., West, J. P., Van Wart, M. R. (2015).Human resource Management in public service: Paradoxes, processes, and problems. Sage Publications. Imran, H., Arif, I., Cheema, S., Azeem, M. (2014). The relationship between jobs Satisfaction, job performance, attitude towards work, and organizational commitment. Entrepreneurship and innovation management journal, 2(2), 135-144.